Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75123/2018disposed

Sonu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-17Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.75123 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2018 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada ====================================================== Sonu Kumar son of Karu Ravidas, resident of Village- Pachhiadih, P.S. Mufassil, District Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhavesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 17-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 112 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a/26 of the Arms Act. Allegation is recovery of one loaded country made pistol and one cartridge from the possession of petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 27.07.2018 and has one criminal antecedent.

Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

However, after six months of custody the petitioner would be enlarge on bail by the court below itself on furnishing

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.75123 of 2018(2) dt.17-12-2018 2/2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Mufassil P.S. Case No. 112 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T