Patna High CourtCR. MISC./77792/2025bail rejected

Aman Singh @ Aman Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-03Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77792 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2025 Thana- BIHIA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Aman Singh @ Aman Kumar Singh S/O Subhash Singh R/O Village- Jhaun, P.S- Bihiyan, Distt.- Bhojpur, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Yadav, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Mr. Rabindra Kumar.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bihiyan P.S. Case No. 245 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that a brick came inside his house, accordingly, he came out of the house and saw the accused persons including the petitioner and petitioner assaulted from back side of an axe causing injury on head, thereafter, the informant informed the police and was taken to PHC for treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77792 of 2025(2) dt.03-12-2025 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that no reason for the occurrence is alleged in the FIR. It is also submitted that on account of village politics, the petitioner has been implicated in the instant case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State Vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail application and submits that there is specific allegation against this petitioner of assaulting the informant by back side of the axe causing injury on head and the injury has been opined to be grievous in nature.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP for the State, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T