Nitesh Yadav @ Nishu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78708 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-343 Year-2025 Thana- CHENARI District- Rohtas ====================================================== Nitesh Yadav @ Nishu Yadav Son of Veer Kunwar Singh R/O Village - Pevandi,P.S - Chenari, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh,Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. A prayer for bail has been made on behalf of the petitioner in connection with Chenari P.S. Case no.343 of 2025 registered under sections 25(1-B)a and 35 of Arms Act.

3. There is a recovery of one country made pistol and one cartridge from the house of the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case of showing false recovery of one country-made pistol and one cartridge from the house of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner was not arrested at the spot and he has been implicated only on account of land dispute between agnates. The petitioner is in custody since 18.08.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78708 of 2025(5) dt.23-02-2026 2/2

6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that petitioner is in custody since 18.08.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and there is no criminal antecedent of similar nature, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Chenari P.S. Case no.343 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned where the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the following conditions:- (I) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be the family member/close relative of the petitioner. (II) The petitioner shall remain physically present in the learned trial Court on each date and shall cooperate in the trial. In case the petitioner is absent on the two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, the learned trial Court would be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T