Rakesh Kumar @ Sukha @ Rakesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76635 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-148 Year-2022 Thana- SALIMPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar @ Sukha @ Rakesh Singh S/o Sri Shivballav Yadav Resident of Village- Kasba, P.S.- Salimpur, Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Salimpur P.S. Case No.148/2022, registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the allegation in sum and substance that unknown criminals snatched money and articles of the informant on point of pistol.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR was against unknown and the name of the petitioner transpired in the statement of the apprehended accused Pankaj Kumar, which is not admissible in evidence.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76635 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of the accused who was apprehended at the spot by the villagers. It is also submitted that similarly situated co-accused has been granted the privilege of regular bail as would manifest from Annexure-2 series to the anticipatory bail application. It is also submitted that investigation in the case is still continuing and if privilege of anticipatory bail is granted, the petitioner may abscond.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned APP, the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
7. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T