Samita Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.13479 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -401 Year- 2017 Thana -BODHGAYA District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Samita Devi, wife of Rajesh Yadav, Resident of Village- Rampur, P.S.- Bodhgaya, District- Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bibhuti Narayan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bodhgaya P.S.Case no.401 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 447, 341, 323, 326, 307,379, 427 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that she is order-giver and allegation of assault is against the other accused persons. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that she is a lady and there is no allegation of assault against her. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13479 of 2018 (2) dt.06-04-2018 2/2 period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Gaya in connection with Bodhgaya P.S.Case No.401 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T