Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78806/2023allowed

Aditya Kumar Dangi @ Sintu v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-07Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78806 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-715 Year-2022 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== ADITYA KUMAR DANGI @ SINTU Son of Ranvijay Singh R/o vill - Noni, P.S. - Tekari, Distt. - Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Brij Bihari Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per FIR, it is a case of assault by the petitioner along with other co-accused persons due to which, the son of the informant sustained injury.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to old dispute. He has committed no offence. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and no specific overt act of assaulting against the petitioner. He submitted that from the perusal of the Injury report of injured person namely,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78806 of 2023(2) dt.07-12-2023 2/2 Kundan Kumar, it appears that all the injuries are simple in nature as opined by doctor, which is annexed as annexure-2. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 28.06.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 715 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T