← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69271/2019bail granted

Kashi Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-27The Chief Justice -4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69271 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2019 Thana- KANGLI District- West Champaran ====================================================== KASHI SAH Son of Ramashrya Sah @ Ramashrya saha Resident of VillageKathia Mathia, P.S.-Kangali, District-West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Khurshid Anwar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 27-11-2019 Instant petition under Sections 439 and 440 of Criminal Procedure Code has been moved for grant of bail in F.I.R. No. 42 of 2019, dated 14.8.2019, registered at Police Station Kangali, under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. I have also perused the relevant record of the case, necessary for adjudication of this petition.

Certain stolen property in the shape of electronic items is alleged to have been recovered from the premises of the accused. The house is open from all sides and not surrounded by a boundary wall. Public can access the same. Petitioner is aged 60 years. It is his first offence and since 16th of August, 2019 he is suffering incarnation. Prima facie, the recovery of the

2/4 incriminating material cannot be said to be from the exclusive possession of the petitioner. In what manner the petitioner has volunteered to assist in concealing the property alleged to have been stolen, at which stage, has not come on record. No further custodial interrogation is required.

Prima facie also it appears that thus far no case against the petitioner is made out indicating his complicity in the alleged crime.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has roots in the society; is not likely to interfere in the investigation or influence any of the witnesses or destroy the evidence; is behind bars since 16.8.2019; no further custodial interrogation is required and he has fully cooperated in the investigation.

Prima facie, nothing is produced to highlight petitioner's direct involvement in the crime. Thus, this Court is of the considered view that petitioner has made out a case for grant of bail. Possibility of false implication, as is so alleged by the petitioner, cannot be ruled out. Also, thus far save and except for naming the petitioner in the F.I.R., no evidence corroborative in nature stands recorded by the police. Also, none has come forward to

3/4 highlight the possible involvement of the petitioner in the crime. On what basis the Investigating Officer could link the accused to the crime is also not emanating from the record. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Kangali P.S. Case No. 42 of 2019, on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his close relative.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(iv) The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the

4/4 State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. Any observation made herein shall not be construed to be an expression on the merits of the matter. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) K.C.Jha/- U T