Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75364 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-595 Year-2023 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== Ajay Kumar S/O Sita Ram Chaudhary R/o Village - Gajadhar Chak, Gola Road, P.S- Danapur, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gajanan Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 37 of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 323, 341, 342, 354, 354A, 509, 504 and 506 of the IPC.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and informant alleges that petitioner called her for a dance programme at the house of Vikash informing that a family party is gong on, accordingly she accompanied the petitioner to the house of Vikash, where 3-4 dancers from before were present, further when the programme started, she felt that some accused were in an intoxicated condition and were acting inappropriately on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75364 of 2025(2) dt.13-11-2025 2/3 which she objected when she was threatened, accordingly the police was informed and the police came and two accused persons were arrested.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that petitioner and the informant were known from before and it was at the behest of petitioner that she had come to perform dance programme. It is further submitted that the FIR does not even remotely disclose that it was petitioner who acted inappropriately or was in a drunken condition. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Phulwari Sharif

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75364 of 2025(2) dt.13-11-2025 3/3 P.S. Case No. 595 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T