← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3903/2024disposed

Rukmani Devi v. The State Of Bihar Through The Collector,

2025-07-18Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3903 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11863 of 2022 ====================================================== Rukmani Devi Wife of Late Ram Sharan Paswan resident of Village-Chousa Basti, P.S- Chousa, District- Madhepura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Collector, Purnea, District Purnea, namely, Sri Suharsh Bhagat.

2.

The Joint Commissioner cum Director General Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna, Smt. Neelam Choudhary. 3.

The District Provident Fund Officer, Purnea, District Purnea, namely, Sri Sunil Kumar.

4.

The Block Development Officer, Purnea, District- Purnea, namely, Prem Kumar.

5.

The Block Development Officer, Bhawanipur, District-Purnea, namely, Raj Kumar.

6.

The Treasury Officer, Purnea, District-Purnea, namely, Sunil Kumar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ghanshyam Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel 22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 18-07-2025 Heard the parties.

2. In compliance with the order of this Court, a show cause affidavit has been filed on behalf of the opposite party nos. 1 and 3 to 6. It has been informed to this Court that in light of the order of this Court, the claim of the petitioner was duly considered and all the admissible amount has been paid to the petitioner. In support of the aforesaid facts payment receipt has also been brought on record vide Anneuxre-R/B.

Patna High Court MJC No.3903 of 2024 dt.18-07-2025 2/2

3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner has not been considered in its letter and spirit and still some amount is due.

4. Having considered the show cause affidavit, this Court does not find any reason to continue with the proceeding. Accordingly, the present contempt proceeding stands closed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise her grievance, if she is not satisfied, before the concerned authorities. (Harish Kumar, J) Anjani/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 19.07.2025 Transmission Date