The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, v. Jitendra Kumar Singh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.678 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6141 of 2023 ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar Singh Son of Brij Mohan Singh Resident of Village- Gulni Kusaha, Police Station, Sambhuganj, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through Sri Chaitanya Prasad, Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Sri Padmakant Jha, the Engineer-in-Chief, Irrigation Creation, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CIVIL REVIEW No. 324 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6141 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The engineer-in Chief, Irrigation creation, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Chief Engineer, Irrigation creation, Water Resources Department, Bhagalpur.

4.

The Treasury Officer, Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Jitendra Kumar Singh Son of Late Brij Mohan Singh, Resident of VillageGulni Kusaha, P.S.- Sambhuganj, District- Banka. 2.

The Principal Accountant General (A and E), Bihar, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 678 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajendra Kumar Jain, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

AC to Standing Counsel 11 (In CIVIL REVIEW No. 324 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rewti Kant Raman, (A.C. To S.C. 11) For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court MJC No.678 of 2024(7) dt.25-02-2026 2/2 25-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsels for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of O.P. Nos. 1 and 2 submitted that the order under contempt has already been complied with as the amount has been duly sanctioned and intimation regarding sanction and payment has been forwarded to the Accountant General, Bihar.

3. Considering the aforesaid information, the present contempt petition is consigned.

4. If the petitioner is still aggrieved in any manner, he may avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law. (Purnendu Singh, J) Ashishsingh/- U