Parshuram Sah @ Pashuram Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3309 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-201 Year-2022 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== PARSHURAM SAH @ PASHURAM KUMAR SAH Son of Ram Chandra Sah, R/v- Madhu Sareya, P.S.- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mohammad Sufyan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-05-2023 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 201 of 2022, registered for offence punishable under sections 364, 365, 376, 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation, Rajeev Sah had love and affection with the daughter of the informant/complainant and he eloped with his daughter. Later on, the informant/complainant came to know that Rajeev Sah has solemnized marriage with his daughter and they were living in Andhra Pradesh in cordial atmosphere. Later on, he came to know that his daughter became traceless and the accused persons, including the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3309 of 2023(4) dt.10-05-2023 2/3 petitioner, have involved in conspiracy of murder of his daughter.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that initially the complaint was lodged. It was sent to the concerned police station for investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is co-villager, having no concern with the allegation levelled in the FIR. He has falsely been implicated in this case. He has also submitted that for the same offence, a case has also been instituted in Andhra Pradesh and trial is going on, but in that case, the petitioner is not an accused. He has next submitted that the co-accused Rajesh Sah @ Rajesh Kumar has also been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 6329 of 2023.
On the other hand, the learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 201 of 2022, subject
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3309 of 2023(4) dt.10-05-2023 3/3 to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.
(ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in the similar type of offence, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application before the court below for cancellation of the bail of the petitioner and the learned court below will take decision in accordance with law.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T