Patna High CourtCR. MISC./68966/2019bail granted

Satendra Koeri @ Satendra Koiri @ Azad Mourya v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-18Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68966 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-246 Year-2018 Thana- ITARHI District- Buxar ====================================================== SATENDRA KOERI @ SATENDRA KOIRI @ AZAD MOURYA Son of Vijay Koeri @ Brij Bihari Singh Resident of Village and P.S. - Itarhi, DistrictBuxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 412 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure 1 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for grant of bail after completing one year in custody. It has been submitted on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68966 of 2019(2) dt.18-12-2019 2/2 case is pending in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No. 246/2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T