Bishun Singh @ Hare Bishnu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2901 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2017 Thana -MANPUR District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== Bishun Singh @ Hare Bishnu Singh, S/o Ramprit Singh, R/o VillageNaubatpur Lotan, P.S.- Manpur, District- Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ganesh Sharma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Manpur P.S. Case No. 64 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Explosive Substance Act.

In the written report there is allegation that this petitioner along with two other accused persons was making Bomb on the boring of Ramprit Singh. It is further alleged that Bomb had exploded, causing injury to one Sahul Kumar. From the written report itself it appears that police had not recovered any incriminating article from possession of this petitioner to suggest that he was making Bomb at the place of occurrence.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2901 of 2018 (2) dt.17-01-2018 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 64 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Nalanda at Biharsharif, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T