← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./85157/2024bail granted

Anil Rai @ Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-03-19Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85157 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2023 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Anil Rai @ Anil Kumar son of Ramlagan Ray R/o Village- Kiratpur Raja Ram, P.S. -Bhagwanpur, Dist. -Vaishali 2.

Sonu Kumar son of Anil Rai R/o Village- Kiratpur Raja Ram, P.S. -Bhagwanpur, Dist. -Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Dinesh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-03-2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, informant, namely Bacchu Kumar, alleged that on 18.12.2022 at 3:30 PM, during a Panchayati which was being held over land dispute, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant and his family members. It is further alleged accused persons also snatched gold chain, mobile phone and cash.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85157 of 2024(2) dt.19-03-2025 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of land dispute between the parties, maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case between the parties. It is further submitted that doctor has found the injured, allegedly caused by these petitioners, to be simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, case and counter-case between the parties, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 6th, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 30 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85157 of 2024(2) dt.19-03-2025 3/3 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T