Pappu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75583 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-328 Year-2024 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Pappu Mahto S/o- Ramchandra Mahto Resident of Village- Fulwariya Rajghar PS- Kalyanpur, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Abhishek Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-12-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that accused persons abused and assaulted him and his family members and committed theft and petitioner assaulted by hand and fist and tried to outrage the modesty of his wife.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner and the informant are agnates and are having dispute relating to property and from
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75583 of 2025(2) dt.11-12-2025 2/2 perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that petitioner is alleged to have assaulted by hand and fist and the date of occurrence is 25.09.2024 and the FIR came to be instituted on 05.10.2024 i.e. after delay of nine days without any plausible explanation of delay. Further, allegation of acting inappropriately with the wife of the informant is alleged, the same is exaggerated allegation.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Kalyanpur P. S. Case No.328 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T