Raushan Sahni @ Raushan Kumar @ Sadhu Sahni @ Sadu Sahni @ Ajay Sahni @ Rohan Sahni @ Roushan Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79833 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2024 Thana- BELA INDUSTRIAL DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== Raushan Sahni @ Raushan Kumar @ Sadhu Sahni @ Sadu Sahni @ Ajay Sahni @ Rohan Sahni @ Roushan Sahni Son of Late Jaydhari Sahni Village -Shyampur, Muja PS- Kanti (But in FIR Ps wrongly written as Panapur), District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Yugal Kishore, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 59 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 317(4), 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Prosecution case, in short, is that, police raided the place of occurrence on the basis of secret information that accused persons were selling the stolen motorcycles and apprehended the accused persons including this petitioner. On search, one motorcycle was recovered from the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79833 of 2024(2) dt.14-11-2024 2/2 petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the recovered motorcycle. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 10.08.2024 and has no criminal antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bela P.S. Case No. 59 of 2024.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T