Chhotelal Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16886 of 2023 ====================================================== Chhotelal Prasad Son of Khublal Prasad, Resident of Jagdev Nagar, Post Office and Police Station- Sasaram, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Additional Chief Secretary, Information Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.
4.
The District Programme Officer, I.C.D.S., Rohtas at Sasaram. 5.
The Chief Commissioner of Information, State Information Commission, Bihar, Patna.
6.
The District Public Information Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kamla Kant Pandey For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Md. N.H. Khan (Sc1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 14-05-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. That by way of this writ application, the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Hon'ble Court for issuance of strict direction of the level of the information center of the State Government to make a proper and just information to the petitioner for the proceeding initiated against the Respondent No. 3 and 4 because the Respondent No. 3 and 4 was directly involved in so many corruptions and to this effect the same was published in the local news papers as also with viral audio, but being the question raised by the
Patna High Court CWJC No.16886 of 2023(2) dt.14-05-2024 2/2 petitioner severally in proper forum, no clear/proper information action against the involved Respondents has been made to the petitioner."
2.
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.
3.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U