Arjun Paswan And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9895 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2017 Thana -GHOSI District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Arjun Paswan, son of late Hari Paswan, &

2. Dharmendra Paswan, son of Sri Arjun Paswan, both resident of villageAnantpur, P.S.-Ghosi, District-Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 21-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Ghosi (Okari) P.S. Case No.130 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B, 201/34 Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that petitioners are father-inlaw and brother-in-law of the deceased. In the written report, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Ghosi (Okari) P.S. Case No.130 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9895 of 2018 (2) dt.21-02-2018 2/2 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bonds and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T