Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77181 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2024 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Roy S/O Bijendra Roy R/O VillageNirbullahchak, P.S. Pachrukhiya, Gaurichak, District- Patna. 2.

Rajeev Kumar @ Rajeev Roy S/O Vijay Roy R/O Village- Nirbullahchak, P.S. Pachrukhiya, Gaurichak, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Patanjali Rishi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 09 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Earlier, anticipatory bail of these petitioners have been rejected by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.12.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 81527 of 2024.

4. The prosecution case, in short, is that the petitioners fired upon the informant and his nephew due to which the informant sustained injury on his left leg and his nephew

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77181 of 2025(3) dt.03-02-2026 2/3 sustained injury on his right leg.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submitted that the allegation levelled against the petitioners are false and baseless. It is further submitted that the injury sustained by the alleged injured persons are simple in nature and on non-vital parts of the body. The petitioners are in custody since 05.06.2025 and have got no criminal antecedent.

6. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

8. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 09 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77181 of 2025(3) dt.03-02-2026 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioners.

(II) The petitioners shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T