Raj Narain Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1390 of 2023 ====================================================== Raj Narain Singh, Son of Nathuni Singh, Village- Kashipur Chakbibi, P.S.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Vaishali, Hajipur.

4.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Hajipur, Vaishali. 5.

The Deputy Director, Consolidation, Vaishali, Hajipur. 6.

The Circle Officer, Hajipur, Vaishali.

7.

Banarsi Singh Son of Munsi Singh Resident of Village- Kashipur Chakibi, P.S. Hajipur, District - Vaishali.

8.

Umanath Singh Son of Munsi Singh Resident of Village- Kashipur Chakibi, P.S. Hajipur, District - Vaishali.

9.

Shivnath Singh Son of Munsi Singh Resident of Village- Kashipur Chakibi, P.S. Hajipur, District - Vaishali.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha (Sc19) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 09-10-2023 1.

The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "i) For issuance of writ in nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to remove encroachment over Public Road situated upon Khesra No. 296, 297 and 298, which was constructed from old Khesra No. 14, 1 decimal and 37, 6 decimal total 7 decimal land.

Patna High Court CWJC No.1390 of 2023(2) dt.09-10-2023 2/2 (II) For issuance of writ in nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 5 to comply the order passed by the Deputy Director, Consolidation in Appeal vide Appeal No. 150/96 dated 06.01.97.

(III) For issuance of writ in nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to take proper/adequate action against the erred official and private respondents."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a suit before the learned civil court of competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U