Shyam Narayan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79205 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-512 Year-2022 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.
Shyam Narayan Singh Son Of Late Ram Sakal Singh Resident Of Village - Tiyaraghat , P.S. - Bhabua, District - Kaimur At Bhabua 2.
Rinku @ Kaushal Son Of Ram Surat Singh Resident Of Village - Tiyaraghat , P.S. - Bhabua, District - Kaimur At Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-01-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
3. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 512 of 2022 dated 03.08.2022 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 447, 341, 387, 504 and 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the coaccused persons are alleged to have cultivated the informant's land forcefully and demanded Rs. 20 lakhs as extortion money.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79205 of 2023(2) dt.23-01-2024 2/2 the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute. The petitioner No. 1 is the full brother and the petitioner No. 2 is the cousin of the informant. The allegation against the petitioners is of demanding Rangadari from his full brother appears to be concocted and unbelievable. The petitioners have three other criminal antecedents and all the said criminal cases have been lodged by the prosecution side as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners.
7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court concerned, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection with Bhabua P.S. Case No. 512 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
8. This application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T