← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76551/2025bail granted

Surendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-01Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76551 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-402 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Surendra Singh S/o Late Dhanu Singh R/o Village - Mahto Musehari, P.S - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran 2.

Ramakant Singh @ Ram Kant Kumar Singh S/o Surendra Singh R/o Village - Mahto Musehari, P.S - Chapra Muffasil, District - Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on orders of Surendra, accused Ramakant assaulted him by Kulhari causing injury on his head, while Surendra assaulted the informant by rod causing injury on his finger. Further, Ritu snatched the chain of the informant while Lila took away Rs.3,000/- from his pocket.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76551 of 2025(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/2 petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that no injury on finger was found and the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature as would manifest from Annexure2 to the anticipatory bail application and the blow is not alleged to have been repeated and the petitioners are not the criminals.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Chapra Mufassil P.S. Case No. 402 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T