← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./75657/2025bail rejected

Rakesh Kumar Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-11Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75657 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2025 Thana- DESARI District- Vaishali ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar Ray Son of Nagdeo Ray R/O VillPowyar Bujurg, P.S.- Sahdai Buzurg, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjit Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case, registered for offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 140(3), 103(1), 238, 61(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

3. The informant, namely, Gita Devi, alleged that her brother-in-law is missing since the night of 13.07.2025. The informant believes that co-accused Tara Devi, in connivance with this petitioner and other co-accused persons, kidnapped the victim (informant's brother-in-law). Subsequently, during course of investigation, dead-body of victim was recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay of 4 days without any explanation of delay. He further submits that only suspicion has been raised against this petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75657 of 2025(2) dt.11-11-2025 2/2

5. However, learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and during course of investigation, co-accused Tara Devi confessed her guilt and disclosed that she along with this petitioner committed the alleged offence.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T