Panalal Mahto @ Pannalal Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79587 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2023 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Panalal Mahto @ Pannalal Mahto S/o- Hardev Mahto Village- Ijra W.No-9, Ps-Sagarmpur Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER 02-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No.124 of 2023.
3. As per the prosecution story, when informant's was sitting at her door then the accused named in the FIR came together and started abusing her. When she stopped them from abusing, Rukhmi Devi's daughter Shanti Devi started hitting her by holding her hair and Hardev Mahto hit her on the head by
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79587 of 2024(2) dt.02-12-2024 2/3 means of 'DAB' with intent to kill her, due to which her head got fractured and blood started oozing out. Pannalal Mahato assaulted her by means of stick. Shanti Devi took out her 'Mangalsutra' worth twenty-five thousand rupees from her neck. Accordingly, the FIR.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner and the informant are agnates i.e. they belong to the same family and are having dispute relating to land. He further submits that specific allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted the informant by means of lathi, but the injuries sustained by the injured is simple in nature.
5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the nature of allegation, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79587 of 2024(2) dt.02-12-2024 3/3 Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No.124 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (S. B. Pd. Singh, J) Prakash Narayan U T