Ram Deep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2387 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-455 Year-2022 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Ram Deep Kumar Son of Jalo Yadav R/v- Bhawani Bigha, P.S.- Mohanpur, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sugani Kumari D/o Bhola Prasad Yadav R/v- Gambhira, P.S.- Meskaur, District- Nawada ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Informant :

Mr.Vishal Saurabh Mr.Sujit Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner, husband of Opposite Party No. 2 apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Section 498(A), 494 of the Indian Penal Code and section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this juncture, the petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 4,000/- (four thousand) per month, starting from this month to Opposite Party No. 2.

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 4,000/- (four thousand) per month, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2387 of 2023(2) dt.08-05-2023 2/2 petitioner above-named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Nawada in connection with Sirdalla P.S. Case No. 455 of 2022 on the following conditions:

(1.) Opposite Party No. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

(2.) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the Opposite Party No. 2.

(3.) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail bond.

(4.) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(5.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(6.) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings.

The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T