Ram Uday Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3845 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -872 Year- 2017 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ====================================================== Ram Uday Rai, Son of Late Saryug Rai, Resident of Village Gauriya Dera, P.S. Bihta (Neura O.P.), District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-02-2018 Heard the parties.

Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in Bihta P.S.Case No.872 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 354, 506, 509/34 of I.P.C. Allegation against the petitioner and accused persons is of assaulting the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is general and omnibus allegation of assault against all the three accused including the petitioner but only two injuries were found. Opinion of the injuries was kept reserved. It has also been submitted that earlier to the present case the petitioner had lodged a case against the informant. The present case is counter blast of the earlier case.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3845 of 2018 (2) dt.01-02-2018 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/-each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Danapur,Patna in Bihta P.S. Case No.872 of 2017 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C. and (1) one of the bailors must be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (ii) the petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence and the petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) AnilKrSinha/- U