Rajeev Sah @ Rajeev Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80883 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-289 Year-2024 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Rajeev Sah @ Rajeev Kumar Sah Son of Bauelal Sah Resident of Village - Amba Ward No.12, P.S. - Teghra, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Informant/s :

Mr. Santosh Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 352, 324(4) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner arrived at the house of the informant and told that he will kill everyone. The informant went into his house due to fear and after this the petitioner fired at his door. After this, the petitioner fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is also submitted that in this case, one empty cartridge was recovered. It is also submitted that no injury has been caused to anybody and there is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80883 of 2024(3) dt.04-02-2025 2/2 no deception of any dispute. During investigation it has come that the parties are agnates and there is land dispute between the parties. From the perusal of the FIR, it is clear that though there is allegation of opening fire at the door but there is no injury to anyone. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 02.09.2024.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer of regular bail and submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Teghra P.S. Case No. 289 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T