← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./82127/2024allowed

Bikash Kumar @ Bikko @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikko v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-29Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.82127 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2022 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Bikash Kumar @ Bikko @ Vikash Kumar @ Vikko S/O Devan Singh Nishad R/O Village- Dumra Diyara, P.S- Maranchi, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasia, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 324, 307, 34 of the I.P.C. and also under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the husband of the informant has gone to get his fan repair. At about 01:00 P.M., on black pulsar bike three persons arrived. Two persons started firing on the husband of the informant due to which the husband of the informant got injured. The FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that during investigation in para-52 police has filed name of three persons namely, Vikash Kumar,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.82127 of 2024(3) dt.29-01-2025 2/2 Monu Kumar and Amarjeet Kumar @ Makka. Vikash Kumar is the petitioner. There is confessional statement of one Amarjeet Kumar @ Makka. In his confessional statement he has attributed the role of driving the bike. He has stated that at the time of occurrence this petitioner was driving the bike. Learned counsel further submits that other accused person has been granted privilege of bail by the trial court.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Barauni (F.C.I.) P.S. Case No.390 of 2022.

7. Accordingly, the present bail application stands allowed.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T