Mannu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69667 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2019 Thana- MATIHANI DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== MANNU KUMAR Son of Shambhu Singh Resident of Village- Kanharpur, P.S.- Pipariya, District- Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 11-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 19.06.2019 in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 97 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 353, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-AA)/25(1-b) A/26/27/35 of the Arms Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with exchange of fire between the police officials and the accused persons. It is submitted that no recovery of any arms has been made from the possession of the petitioner. The accusation of firing is general and omnibus against all the accused persons. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, let the petitioner above named be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69667 of 2019(2) dt.11-12-2019 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Juned Alam, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Begusarai, in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 97 of 2019, on the following conditions- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial. (iii) That the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T