Kailu Rajbanshi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85152 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2024 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== Kailu Rajbanshi, aged about 45 years, (Male), S/O Karu Ram, Resident Of Village - Kendua, P.S- Hisua, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mrs. Sharda Kumari, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 113 of 2024 dated 22.02.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 365 of the I.P.C.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused person are alleged to have kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather the same is against the co-accused Mantu Rajbanshi. The alleged occurrence took place on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85152 of 2024(3) dt.17-02-2025 2/2 11.02.2024 as to when the F.I.R. has been lodged on 22.02.2024 and the delay in lodging of the F.I.R. has not been explained by the prosecution. It is submitted that except suspicion, there is nothing against the petitioner. It is further submitted that as per the order dated 15.09.2024, passed by the learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Nawada, it appears that the victim is not traceless. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition. He is in custody in this case since 06.06.2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Nawada in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 113 of 2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U.K./- U T