Pappu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75684 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-384 Year-2015 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Pappu Paswan S/o Late Acchelal Paswan Resident of Village- Murtiya, P.S.- Adapur, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 307, 328, 498 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on, Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code was added.

3. As per prosecution case, informant alleged that on 06.11.2015 at night, her husband, in a planned conspiracy with all the other F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, dragged her out of the house, assaulted her with knife and threw her. During course of treatment, the informant died.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75684 of 2025(2) dt.14-11-2025 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be brother-in-law of the deceased. Petitioner is separate in mess and property and has got no concern with the affairs of the deceased and her husband. Thrust of accusation is against husband of deceased. Police after investigation submitted final form against this petitioner. Petitioner, having no criminal antecedent, is in custody since 30.06.2025. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, clean antecedents of the petitioner and period of custody, the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Sikarhana at Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 384 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75684 of 2025(2) dt.14-11-2025 3/3 2015.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T