← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./78898/2023allowed

Rohit Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-07Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78898 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2023 Thana- NATWAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== ROHIT KUMAR THAKUR S/O UMESH THAKUR RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- CHAKKI J P DERA, P.S- BRAHAMPUR, DISTRICT-BUXAR. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Pradhan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 07-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown miscreants came on motorcycle and stopped the informant's motorcycle and snatched his cash and mobile along with from his friend's.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional statement of himself before the police, which has got no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78898 of 2023(2) dt.07-12-2023 2/2 evidentiary value in the eyes of law. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He is languishing in judicial custody since 20.03.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Bikramganj, Rohtas in connection with Natwar P.S. Case No. 35 of 2023. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T