Sipahi Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.10296 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2017 Thana- SISWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== Sipahi Yadav S/o Jagarnath Yadav, R/o Village- Chataiya, P.S.- Siswan, District- Siwan ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Prashank Kumar, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque, APP 159 For the informant : Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 07-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 207 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 342, 323 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
In the written report it is alleged that the petitioner is the order giver. There is no allegation against this petitioner of making firing on the father of the informant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 207 of 2017 he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10296 of 2018(2) dt.07-03-2018 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, X, Siwan, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) Shamshad/- U T