Faizan Mansoori @ Md. Faizan Mansoori @ Chhote Mansoori @ Chhotu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75358 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2025 Thana- BARGAINIA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Faizan Mansoori @ Md. Faizan Mansoori @ Chhote Mansoori @ Chhotu S/o Nasir Mansoori @ Nasir Ahamad Mansoori @ Nasal Miyan Resident of Village- Chakwa, P.S.- Bairgania, Dist.- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-11-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently at para-3, it has been pleaded that petitioner has antecedent of two cases, when he has antecedent of four cases, for which a supplementary affidavit has been filed online and hard copy would be filed. It is next submitted that allegation is of recovery of 60.6 litres of liquor from a car. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75358 of 2025(2) dt.13-11-2025 2/3 recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of the seized vehicle and he came to be implicated based on confessional statement of Chhote Mahto in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Bairgania P.S. Case No. 184 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. 7.

It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than four cases then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this Court, as such, the provisional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75358 of 2025(2) dt.13-11-2025 3/3 anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of four cases, in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T