Kundan Kumar Alias Kundan Kumar Nayak v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17793 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Kundan Kumar alias Kundan Kumar Nayak Son of Yashwant Kumar, Resident of Mahatma Gandhi Path, Ward No. 9, Nagar Panchayat Dalsingsarai, Post Office and Police Station - Dalsingsarai and District - Samastipur.

2.

Raj Kumar Sharma, Son of Late Rameshwar Sharma, Resident of Ward No.- 2, Chaklokman, Dalsingsarai, Post Office and Police Station - Dalsingsarai and District - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Mines Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Mines Director, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Vaishali at Hazipur. 5.

The Mineral Development Officer, Vaishali at Hazipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Avinash Chandra, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, GP 17 For the Mines :

Mr. Naresh Dixit, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 04-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present writ petition has been filed for direction upon the authority concerned for refund of Rs. 2,59,400/- which he has deposited on 13.06.2023 as a compounding fee and fine for compounding in compliance of the letter No. 776 dated 13.06.2023 (Annexure P-5) and it appears from the pleading that the petitioners had deposited the same and after depositing the amount

Patna High Court CWJC No.17793 of 2023 dt.04-02-2025 2/2 in question, the vehicle of the petitioner was released by the authority concerned and after the releasing of the vehicle in question the petitioner has approached this Court to refund the aforesaid amount without any reason.

3. There is no merit in the writ petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ranjeet/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 06.02.2025 Transmission Date