Bhupendra Yadav Alias Bhupendra Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79767 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-265 Year-2020 Thana- SINGHESHWAR District- Madhepura ====================================================== Bhupendra Yadav Alias Bhupendra Kumar Yadav Son Of Bindeshwari Yadav R/O Village- Satokhar, P.S.- Singheshwasr, District- Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.N. A. Shamsi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 448, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per prosecution case, the allegation against the accused persons including the petitioner is that they armed with various weapons came and started assaulting the informant and when his grandson came to save him then all accused persons also assaulted him by means of lathi danda and iron rod due to which he sustained injuries. It is further alleged that after assaulting they also took away golden chain of his grandson worth Rs. 30,000/- as well as mobile phone and other articles. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79767 of 2023(2) dt.11-12-2023 2/2 falsely been implicated in this case due to previous land dispute. There is case and counter case between the parties and general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 06.10.2023.

Learned APP appearing for the state and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioners, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 265 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Madhepura.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) manishkumar/- U T