Shambhu Prasad Roy v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.19363 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1163 Year- 2017 Thana -BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBEGUSARAI ====================================================== Shambhu Prasad Roy, Son of late Ram Bahadur Roy, Resident of VillageCheria, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Priyanka Kumari, W/o Amit Kumar, D/o Late Shiv Shanker Singh, R/o Village- Cheria, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Begusarai, At Present R/o Bihat, P.S. - Barauni, District- Begusarai.
.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jai Prakash Singh and Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocates.
For the State : Mr. Atul Chandra, A.P.P. 12. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-04-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 498(A), 313, 314 and 307 of the IPC but cognizance has been taken under Sections 498(A) and 323/34 of the IPC.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19363 of 2018 (2) dt.09-04-2018 2/2 is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The petitioner is the father-in-law of the victim. He is separate in mess and property from the husband of the victim. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Begusarai, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1163C of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T