Santosh Ravani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5947 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -213 Year- 2017 Thana -JAGDIHSPUR District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Santosh Ravani, s/o late Singasan Ravani, R/o Mohalla- Ward No.11, Suthatti, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 21-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 213 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that petitioner is father-in-law of the deceased. The informant has merely raised suspicion against this petitioner that he has caused the death of his son in his Sasural by giving poison. It has further been submitted that other co-accused Rina Devi has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 19.12.2017passed in Cr. Misc. No. 60768 of 2017.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5947 of 2018 (3) dt.21-02-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 213 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIth, Bhojpur, Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T