Upendra Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 73037 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-385 Year-2018 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Upendra Paswan aged about 53 years, Gender - Male, Son of Brhaspati Paswan Resident of Village-Maricha Ward No.13, P.S. and District-Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amar Nath Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Supaul P.S. Case No. 385 of 2018 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per F.I.R., informant's father was assaulted by petitioner and others, but as per injury report, the injury found to be simple in nature caused by hard & blunt substance. He further submits that there is case and counter case in between the parties and due to land dispute, the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. He submits that petitioner is having clean antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as nature of accusation, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the petitioner above
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.73037 of 2019(2) dt.20-11-2019 2/2 named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 385 of 2018 on the following conditions:
(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tempers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T