Vinit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6258 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-458 Year-2017 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Vinit Singh, S/o Narayan Singh, R/o Village- Salkhani, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rina Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections, 188, 420, 272,, 273, 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 38, 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 2961 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accuseds namely Gopi Kumar and Shambhu Nath Singh. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6258 of 2018(4) dt.22-03-2018 2/2 in this case. It is alleged that 2961 liters wine is recovered from the truck in question. The truck in question does not belong to the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Other co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 20.02.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 10079 of 2018.

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 6th A.D.J., Saran in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 458/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T