Goswami Badri Narayan Giri, v. The State Of Bihar.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 24635 of 2019 ====================================================== Goswami Badri Narayan Giri, aged about 75 years Male, Son of Late Sata Nand Giri, Resident of Village- Bodh Gaya, P.S.- Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar. Bihar.

2.

The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Gaya, Bihar. 5.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Gaya, Bihar. 6.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Gaya.

7.

The Circle Officer, Bodh Gaya, Gaya Bihar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Tiwary, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md.Majid Mahboob Khan, Ac to AAG 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 16-12-2019 Heard Mr. Ranjeet Tiwary, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to AAG12 for the State.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs:

"For quash the order dated 27.08.2013/13.09.2013 passed in Ceiling Case No. 01 of 2012-13 by the Court of Learned District Magistrate, Gaya whereby and whereunder the respondent No. 4 the District Magistrate, Gaya has rejected the petition of the petitioner assigning the reason that this authority is empowered to reopen the Ceiling Proceeding under U/S 45(B) of Bihar Land Reform Fixation of Ceiling Area & Acquisition

Patna High Court CWJC No.24635 of 2019(2) dt.16-12-2019 2/2 of Surplus Land Act 1961 and further be pleased to issue direction to the respondents to release the self purchased land of the petitioner declared surplus clubbing with the land of Jai Ram Giri.

(ii) For any other relief or reliefs as your Lordship may deed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition for moving before the statutory authorities, in accordance with law.

4. In view thereof, as prayed for by learned counsel for the petitioner, the application stands disposed off as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U