Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76667/2025bail granted

Ajay v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-12Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76667 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2025 Thana- YADOPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Ajay S/O Pramod R/O Sakin-Chirai, P.S.- Tigaw, Dist.- Faridabad 2.

Shahbaz Khan S/O Yamin Khan Resident of - Sakin-Sector 87, P.S.- Khedipur, District- Faridabad Khan ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rambabu Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 12-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in Jadopur P.S. Case No. 167 of 2025 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 246.78 liters liquor was recovered from car and the petitioners were arrested on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76667 of 2025(2) dt.12-11-2025 2/2 possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is not the owner of the car in question and he had no knowledge regarding nature of goods kept in the car. The petitioners are in custody since 25.08.2025 and have got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Jadopur P.S. Case No. 167 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Pankaj/- U T