Md. Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.5206 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2017 Thana -PATEPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Md. Alam, Son of Md. Shafique, resident of Village- Teknari, Police Station- Patepur, District- Vaishali.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Md.Imteyaz Ahmad, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Kumar Virendra Narayan, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 30(a), 32(ii) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 1015.425 liters wine is said to have been recovered.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is alleged that total 1015.425 liters wine is recovered from the vehicle of the petitioner. The vehicle in question is run as a
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5206 of 2018 (3) dt.19-03-2018 2/2 Taxi by the driver of the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Patepur P.S. Case No. 90/2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T