Ankit Tiwari @ Ankit Kr. Ankan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.75714 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2025 Thana- KATORIYA District- Banka ====================================================== Ankit Tiwari @ Ankit Kr. Ankan Son of Mithilesh Tiwari R/o VillageRajbarra, P.S.- Katoria, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 24-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Katoria P.S. Case No. 230 of 2025, G.R. No. 2518/2025, dated 21.07.2025, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 74, 303(2), 118(2), 352 & 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per prosecution case, the petitioner and other coaccused persons assaulted the husband of the informant and this petitioner is stated to have given a dabiya blow on the husband of the informant who received injury on his left hand. The informant was also assaulted.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75714 of 2025(2) dt.24-11-2025 2/3 been implicated in the present case. The father of the petitioner and husband of the informant are step brothers and there is dispute over a property between them. There is no injury on the head of the husband of the informant and the impugned order wrongly mentions this fact. However, the husband of the informant received injury on left forearm of size 4"x1"x1" and the same is stated to be grievous due to fracture of distral part of left radius and ulna. There is no sharp cut injury on head. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 09.08.2025 and chargesheet has been submitted.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that charge-sheet has been submitted and further considering period of custody of the petitioner and absence of injury attributed against the petitioner, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka, /concerned court, in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.75714 of 2025(2) dt.24-11-2025 3/3 connection with Katoria P.S. Case No. 230 of 2025, G.R. No. 2518/2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the B.N.S.. and other following conditions: (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial Court.

(iii) In case of non-appearance of the petitioner on single date or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned (Arun Kumar Jha, J) Ranjeet/- U T