Raushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11392 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2023 Thana- PIPRAHI District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1.
Raushan Singh S/O Brij Kishore Singh R/O Village- Singahi, P.S.- Piprahi, District- Sheohar 2.
Lakhendra Patel S/O Late Pukar Patel R/O Village- Singahi, P.S.- Piprahi, District- Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhushan Bharat, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Shaheen Begum, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No. 147 of 2023 dated 01.07.2023 for the offence punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.
3. As per the prosecution case, total 18 litres of illicit nepali country made liquor was recovered from the motorcycle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11392 of 2024(2) dt.28-02-2024 2/3 petitioners are neither the owner nor the driver of the said motorcycle. The said motorcycle was not being driven by the petitioners at the time of the alleged occurrence. Local Chowkidar disclosed the name of the petitioners. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner no. 1 has one criminal antecedent and the petitioner no.2 has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. Learned counsel has submitted that no case is made out against the petitioners. Learned Counsel has relied on the judgment of Full Bench of Hon'ble Patna High Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. State of Bihar 2019 (2) PLJR 1089. The Full Bench in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav (supra) has held that an application for anticipatory bail in a case arising out of Bihar Excise and Prohibition Act can be maintained, despite the bar under Section 76 (2) of the Act, if on the basis of allegation made in the FIR, no offence under the said provision is made out.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners by submitting that the bar of Section 76(2) of the Act applies in this case.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11392 of 2024(2) dt.28-02-2024 3/3 of the case as well as the material available on record, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Sheohar in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No. 147 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) annpurna/- U T