Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10501/2018rejected

Brij Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-05Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10501 of 2018 Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -564 Year- 2015 Thana -TURKAULIYA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Brij Kishore Singh Son of late Rama Singh Resident of Village- Majuraha, Police Station- Turkaulia, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-03-2018 Heard.

The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Turkauliya P.S.Case No.564 of 2015 pending in the Court of CJM, East Champaran at Motihari registered for an offence under Section 307 and other Sections of the IPC.

This is the second attempt of the petitioner to obtain anticipatory bail. His prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected on 15.06.2016 in Cr.Misc.No.22319 of 2016 considering the fact that there was specific allegation that he had caused grievous injuries which is fracture on the left side of frontal bone on the head of injured.

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the matter has been compromised and the informant does not

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10501 of 2018 (2) dt.05-03-2018 2/2 want to contest this case. This Court while rejecting the prayer for anticipatory bail had directed the petitioner to surrender before the court below where his prayer was directed to be considered on the same day on merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. In spite of direction, the petitioner remained silent for more than 18 months without any plausible reason.

Considering the grievous nature of injuries, facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to reconsider his prayer for anticipatory bail. His prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

(Sanjay Kumar, J) B.Kr./- U T