Patna High CourtCR. MISC./84490/2024dismissed

Sunil Chandrawanshi @ Sunil Sadhu @ Sadhu v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-04Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84490 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-110 Year-2022 Thana- RAFIGANJ District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Sunil Chandrawanshi @ Sunil Sadhu @ Sadhu Son of Late Nageshwar Chandrawanshi Resident of village - Munsibigha, P.S.- Muffasil, District - Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of bail. Earlier his application was rejected vide order dated 02.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18382/2024.

3. The following order was passed on 02.04.2024:

"Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This application for grant of regular bail arises out of Rafiganj P.S. Case No.110 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Later on, section 395 of the Indian Penal Code was also added.

3. Unknown criminals have committed dacoity of Rs.2,37,265/- from Gramin Bank. The petitioner is in custody since 01.12.2023.

4. During investigation, materials have come to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84490 of 2024(3) dt.04-04-2025 2/2 connect the petitioner with the crime. The petitioner is accused in five more criminal cases.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner privilege of regular bail. Accordingly, this bail application is rejected. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of all the cases pending against the petitioner and conclude the same as early as possible."

4. In the trail, three witnesses have already been examined.

5. Since the trial has started, this application is dismissed.

6. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T