← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70334/2019bail granted

Ram Nath Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2019-12-04Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70334 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-612 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== RAM NATH RAM Son of Late Lakhan Ram Resident of Village - Jaynagar, Ward No. 12, P.S.- Sonbarsa, Distt.- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Complaint Case No. C-2 612/19 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 40 litres of Desi Kachi Nepali Wine from the possession of petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case and nothing was recovered from the possession of petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 20.09.2019.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70334 of 2019(2) dt.04-12-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below, in connection with Complaint Case No. C-2 612/19 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T