← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./76133/2025allowed

Satendra Yadav @ Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-27Mr. Justice Harish Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76133 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2025 Thana- BODHGAYA District- Gaya ====================================================== Satendra Yadav @ Satyendra Yadav, S/o Shiv Narayan Yadav, R/o VillageKurumdih, P.S.- Bodhgaya, District- Gaya, State -Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prithivi Raj Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajiv Nayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-11-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No. 269 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115 (2), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 117(2), 74, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is of causing assault by means of lathi upon the informant along with other co-accused persons, due to which he sustained serious injury. There is further allegation that petitioner along with others also snatched golden ear ring from the wife of the informant and assaulted by catching hold her hair.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner and the informant are full brother and co-sharer in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76133 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/3 the property. In fact, on account of a dispute arisen for partition, the family of both the brothers entered into a scuffle. However, if the allegation is taken to be true, the same is omnibus in nature and not specifically attributed to the petitioners; the injuries sustained to the informant is on non-vital part of the body, though it is grievous in nature. The petitioner bears fair antecedent and he undertakes that he will fully cooperate in the proceeding of the court.

5. On the other hand, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that because of the assault being made by the petitioner along with other co-accused persons, the injured sustained grievous injury, though over his hand.

6. Having considered the submissions advanced by the learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of the close relationship between the parties, coupled with the injury over the non-vital part of the body, as also the fair antecedent of the petitioner, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76133 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya in connection with Bodhgaya P.S. Case No. 269 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close relative of the petitioner.

(Harish Kumar, J) uday/- U T