Kamli Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25462 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -106 Year- 2017 Thana -ROUH District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Kamli Devi, W/o Shiv Shankar Saw @ Shiv Shankar Prasad,

2. Shiv Shankar Saw @ Shiv Shankar Prasad, S/o Late Srichand Saw, Both R/o Vill.- Marara, P.S.- Roh, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Roh P.S. Case No. 106 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that petitioners are parents-inlaw of the deceased. In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Roh P.S. Case No. 106

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25462 of 2018 (2) dt.02-05-2018 2/2 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and their absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel their bail bond and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T